ORIGINS OF LENGTH

  ORIGINS & VALUES OF LENGTH

The current popular and widely used measurement systems are the Imperial System and the Metric System. Based on our current approach, the conversion of the common length units in the Metric and Imperial systems is based on  1 inch being equal to 2.54cm. Thus, the multiples and multipliers of the Metric and Imperial Units of length are as follows.

Current Conversion of Metric & Imperial Units of Length

CURRENT CONVERSION	METRIC-CM	IMPERIAL-INCHES	IMPERIAL-FOOT	IMPERIAL-YARDS	METRIC-METRES	METRIC-KM	IMPERIAL-MILES
METRIC-CM	1	0.393700787	0.032808399	0.010936133	0.01	0.00001	6.21371E-06
IMPERIAL-INCHES	2.54	1	0.083333333	0.027777778	0.0254	0.0000254	1.57828E-05
IMPERIAL FOOT	30.48	12	1	0.333333333	0.3048	0.0003048	0.000189394
IMPERIAL-YARDS	91.44	36	3	1	0.9144	0.0009144	0.000568182
NETRIC-METRES	100	39.37007874	3.280839895	1.093613298	1	0.001	0.000621371
METRIC-KM	100000	39370.07874	3280.839895	1093.613298	1000	1	0.621371192
IMPERIAL-MILES	160934.4	63360	5280	1760	1609.344	1.609344	1

 

According to GUSUMS, the above conversion is likely to be inaccurate. GUSUMS explains that we misinterpreted the concepts of the feet or palm as a measure to mean a particular person’s feet or palm when it should have been interpreted to mean the ratio of the foot or palm to other body parts. For example, by interpreting the feet as the length of a particular person’s foot e.g. King Henry the First we got the wrong value. This is because the value gotten only applies to that particular person. However, if we measure the foot in terms of the ratio of the foot to the average person’s leg, chest, height, etc. we get a highly constant figure since it’s a ratio or is a figure that does not apply to the unique properties of a single person. In addition, since all the units of length in both the Metric and Imperial systems are linear, then their multiples, multipliers, and conversion factors should be based on the natural numbers that are multiples and multipliers of 360. This is because all or most linear values involve joining points of a circle and the points in a circle can only be gotten by dividing the circle into equal parts. Thus, the possible and perfect divisions of a circle can be summarized as the natural numbers that can divide 360 which are;

 

Natural Numbers that can divide 360	Reverse order
360 ÷ 1 = 360 360 ÷ 2 = 180 360 ÷ 3 = 120 360 ÷ 4 = 90 360 ÷ 5 = 72 360 ÷ 6 = 60 360 ÷ 8 = 45 360 ÷ 9 = 40 360 ÷ 10 = 36 360 ÷ 12 = 30 360 ÷ 15 = 24 360 ÷ 18 = 20	60 ÷ 20 = 18 360 ÷ 24 = 15 360 ÷ 30 = 12 360 ÷ 36 = 10 360 ÷ 40 = 9 360 ÷ 45 = 8 360 ÷ 60 = 6 360 ÷ 72 = 5 360 ÷ 90 = 4 360 ÷ 120 = 3 360 ÷ 180 = 2 360 ÷ 360 = 1
First 12 Natural Numbers	The next 12 Natural Numbers
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18	20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 45, 60, 72, 90, 120, 180, 360.

 

Based on the above table, the likely factors/multipliers of all linear values are likely to be

ROTATION MULTIPLES	ROTATION MULTIPLIERS	REVOLUTION MULTIPLES	REVOLUTION MULTIPLIERS
1	1	1	1
2	0.5	4	0.25
3	0.333333333	9	0.111111111
4	0.25	16	0.0625
5	0.2	25	0.04
6	0.166666667	36	0.027777778
8	0.125	64	0.015625
9	0.111111111	81	0.012345679
10	0.1	100	0.01
12	0.083333333	144	0.006944444
15	0.066666667	225	0.004444444
18	0.055555556	324	0.00308642
20	0.05	400	0.0025
24	0.041666667	576	0.001736111
30	0.033333333	900	0.001111111
36	0.027777778	1296	0.000771605
40	0.025	1600	0.000625
45	0.022222222	2025	0.000493827
60	0.016666667	3600	0.000277778
72	0.013888889	5184	0.000192901
90	0.011111111	8100	0.000123457
120	0.008333333	14400	6.94444E-05
180	0.005555556	32400	3.08642E-05
360	0.002777778	129600	7.71605E-06

 

Based on the above factors as well as on the idea that all units of measurement are based on the circle, then the only possible way that we can convert Imperial linear units of length to Metric Units of length is if 1 inch is equal to exactly 2.5cm. Based on this, the table below shows the GUSUMS version of how the imperial and Metric Systems should be converted if they are both drawn from the circle.

GUSUMS Conversion of Linear Metric & Imperial Units of Length

GUSUMS-CONVERSION	METRIC-CM	GUSUMS-INCHES	GUSUMS-FOOT	GUSUMS-YARDS	METRIC-METRES	METRIC-KM	GUSUMS-MILES
METRIC-CM	1	0.4	0.033333333	0.011111111	0.01	0.00001	6.31313E-06
GUSUMS-INCHES	2.5	1	0.083333333	0.027777778	0.025	0.000025	1.57828E-05
GUSUMS-FOOT	30	12	1	0.333333333	0.3	0.0003	0.000189394
GUSUMS-YARDS	90	36	3	1	0.9	0.0009	0.000568182
METRIC-METRES	100	40	3.333333333	1.111111111	1	0.001	0.000631313
METRIC-KM	100000	40000	3333.333333	1111.111111	1000	1	0.631313131
GUSUMS-MILES	158400	63360	5280	1760	1584	1.584	1

 

From the above conversion, you can see that all the multiples and multipliers of both the GUSUMS units of length and the metric units of length all conform to the expected behavior of linear units and values. An alternative explanation as to why 1 inch should be equal to 2.5cm and not 2.54cm can be done by trying to derive both units from the circle using the concept of linear and circular values.

DERIVING THE METRIC & IMPERIAL SYSTEM FROM THE CIRCLE.

From the page on the Origin of Metrology & the Origin of PI, I demonstrated that a circle of diameter 1 as the basis of linear and circular values. For example, when you draw a circle with a diameter of 1 and inscribe a hexagon inside it, the circumference of the circle will signify the circular value and the perimeter of the hexagon will signify the first linear value or the linear circumference. The following example illustrates this.

First Circular & Linear Values

The above image shows the first circular and linear values. You cannot that the first circular value is pi and the first linear value is 3.  This is true in practice as all circular measurements are based on pi each the circumference or the area of a circle or an arc. The same applies to all linear values as they are based on a factor of 3 or multiples and multipliers of 3. For example, 4*3 inches is 1 foot, and 12*3 feet is 1 yard. I also demonstrated that drawing subsequent circles and hexagons maintains the same patterns.

Second Circular & Linear Values

The above image shows that doubling the radius or diameter also doubles the sides of the hexagon and its perimeter and also doubles the circular circumference thus resulting in the same ratio.

 

Third Circular & Linear Values

The above image shows that tripling the radius or diameter also triples the sides of the hexagon and its perimeter (linear circumference) and also triples the circular circumference thus resulting in the same ratio of linear and circular values.

The Origin of the Imperial System

GUSUMS argues that the linear circumference was the origin of the imperial system. Thus the base number of the imperial system should be 3. However, after further advancements in mathematics and mathematical operations, it was/is possible to play around with the 3 and create additional units. Despite this, the units of length in the metric system largely still follow this rule as shown in the table below

 

DIAMETER	LINEAR BASE NUMBERS-LBN	LBN MULTIPLIERS
1	3	0.333333333
2	6	0.166666667
3	9	0.111111111
4	12	0.083333333
5	15	0.066666667
6	18	0.055555556
7	21	0.047619048
8	24	0.041666667
9	27	0.037037037
10	30	0.033333333
11	33	0.03030303
12	36	0.027777778
13	39	0.025641026
14	42	0.023809524
15	45	0.022222222
16	48	0.020833333
17	51	0.019607843
18	54	0.018518519
19	57	0.01754386
20	60	0.016666667
21	63	0.015873016
22	66	0.015151515
23	69	0.014492754
24	72	0.013888889
25	75	0.013333333
26	78	0.012820513
27	81	0.012345679
28	84	0.011904762
29	87	0.011494253
30	90	0.011111111
31	93	0.010752688
32	96	0.010416667
33	99	0.01010101
34	102	0.009803922
35	105	0.00952381
36	108	0.009259259

 

I can simplify the above table to the following;

Column1	3	6	9	12	15	18	21	24	27	30	33	36
1	0.333333	0.166667	0.111111	0.083333	0.066667	0.055556	0.047619	0.041667	0.037037	0.033333	0.030303	0.027778
2	0.666667	0.333333	0.222222	0.166667	0.133333	0.111111	0.095238	0.083333	0.074074	0.066667	0.060606	0.055556
3	1	0.5	0.333333	0.25	0.2	0.166667	0.142857	0.125	0.111111	0.1	0.090909	0.083333
4	1.333333	0.666667	0.444444	0.333333	0.266667	0.222222	0.190476	0.166667	0.148148	0.133333	0.121212	0.111111
5	1.666667	0.833333	0.555556	0.416667	0.333333	0.277778	0.238095	0.208333	0.185185	0.166667	0.151515	0.138889
6	2	1	0.666667	0.5	0.4	0.333333	0.285714	0.25	0.222222	0.2	0.181818	0.166667
7	2.333333	1.166667	0.777778	0.583333	0.466667	0.388889	0.333333	0.291667	0.259259	0.233333	0.212121	0.194444
8	2.666667	1.333333	0.888889	0.666667	0.533333	0.444444	0.380952	0.333333	0.296296	0.266667	0.242424	0.222222
9	3	1.5	1	0.75	0.6	0.5	0.428571	0.375	0.333333	0.3	0.272727	0.25
10	3.333333	1.666667	1.111111	0.833333	0.666667	0.555556	0.47619	0.416667	0.37037	0.333333	0.30303	0.277778

Interpretation

FOOTS   YARD 1 = 0.33333333333333 2 = 0.66666666666667 3 = 1 4 = 1.3333333333333 5 = 1.6666666666667 7 = 2.3333333333333 8 = 2.6666666666667 9 = 3 10 = 3.3333333333333	INCHES   FOOTS 1 = 0.083333333333333 2 = 0.16666666666667 3 = 0.25 4 = 0.33333333333333 5 = 0.41666666666667 7 = 0.58333333333333 8 = 0.66666666666667 9 = 0.75 10 = 0.83333333333333
INCHES   YARD 1 = 0.027777777777778 2 = 0.055555555555556 3 = 0.083333333333333 4 = 0.11111111111111 5 = 0.13888888888889 7 = 0.19444444444444 8 = 0.22222222222222 9 = 0.25 10 = 0.27777777777778	PALM   FINGER (CLOTH) 1 = 0.66666666666667 2 = 1.3333333333333 3 = 2 4 = 2.6666666666667 5 = 3.3333333333333 7 = 4.6666666666667 8 = 5.3333333333333 9 = 6 10 = 6.6666666666667
PALM   YARD 1 = 0.083333333333333 2 = 0.16666666666667 3 = 0.25 4 = 0.33333333333333 5 = 0.41666666666667 7 = 0.58333333333333 8 = 0.66666666666667 9 = 0.75 10 = 0.83333333333333	PALM   FATHOM 1 = 0.041666666666667 2 = 0.083333333333333 3 = 0.125 4 = 0.16666666666667 5 = 0.20833333333333 7 = 0.29166666666667 8 = 0.33333333333333 9 = 0.375 10 = 0.41666666666667
INCHES   PACE 1 = 0.033333333333333 2 = 0.066666666666667 3 = 0.1 4 = 0.13333333333333 5 = 0.16666666666667 7 = 0.23333333333333 8 = 0.26666666666667 9 = 0.3 10 = 0.33333333333333	INCHES   LINK (RAMSDEN'S; ENGINEER'S) 1 = 0.083333333333333 2 = 0.16666666666667 3 = 0.25 4 = 0.33333333333333 5 = 0.41666666666667 7 = 0.58333333333333 8 = 0.66666666666667 9 = 0.75 10 = 0.83333333333333

 

Basically, from the above table, I can acquire almost all imperial units. This confirms that the imperial units originated from the circle and are based  on the linear circumference of the circle. In addition, the factors or multipliers provide a glimpse of what the multiples and multipliers of linear values should look like as they all/mostly end with recurring numbers, multiples/multipliers of 3, or multiples/multipliers of 5.

A key exception to the above statement is when the column has a value of 21. 21 is exceptional as it contains random numbers with no particular patterns such as when column 1 is 1,2,4,5,8, & 10. However, in multiples of 3, we can see that the values of the pi rules such as 0.142857142, 0.285714285, 0.428571428, 0.571428571, 0.714285714, 0.857142857, or a whole number begin to appear. This confirms that the linear and circular values unite in the LCMs of the linear base number which is 3 and it multiples/multipliers and the circular base number which is 7 and its multiples/multipliers. Thus, the base number of linear values is 3 and the base number of circular values is 7. This was the origin of pi as explained in the pi page.

ORIGINS OF THE METRIC SYSTEM

The above table confirms that 3 is the base number of the Imperial units of length. The next challenge is to derive the metric system from the circle by just using the concept of linear and circular values. From the pages/posts on the Origins of Metrology & Origins of Pi, I had stated that pi is not actually the basis or base number of circular units. I illustrated that 7 is the basis of identifying circular values.  This is why I started and gave the GUSUMS formulae for calculating the circumference of a circle as;

Circumference of a circle = Diameter/base number of circular units + d*the base number of linear values

Base number of circular units =7

the base number of linear values =3

Circumference of a circle = Diameter/7 + d*3

For example; the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 1 is equal to;

Circumference of a circle when D is 1 = 1/7 + d*3

=3

I also provided the following table to show that this is true.

D	D/7	D*3	D/7+D*3
1	0.142857143	3	3.142857143
2	0.285714286	6	6.285714286
3	0.428571429	9	9.428571429
4	0.571428571	12	12.57142857
5	0.714285714	15	15.71428571
6	0.857142857	18	18.85714286
7	1	21	22
8	1.142857143	24	25.14285714
9	1.285714286	27	28.28571429
10	1.428571429	30	31.42857143
11	1.571428571	33	34.57142857
12	1.714285714	36	37.71428571
13	1.857142857	39	40.85714286
14	2	42	44
15	2.142857143	45	47.14285714
16	2.285714286	48	50.28571429
17	2.428571429	51	53.42857143
18	2.571428571	54	56.57142857
19	2.714285714	57	59.71428571
20	2.857142857	60	62.85714286
21	3	63	66
22	3.142857143	66	69.14285714
23	3.285714286	69	72.28571429

 

Therefore, the base number of circular units is 7 and the base number of linear units is 3. Therefore, if the linear base number is 3 the circular base number is 7. If we double the linear base number to 6 then the base number of circular measurements will also double to 14. If we triple the base linear number to 9 the circular base number will also triple to 21. This goes on to infinity. So, how can we derive the metric units from this?

We do know that the base value of metric units is 10 as changing from one unit to another e.g. from km, cm, m, dm, mm, Dm, etc and vice versa involves dividing or multiplying the values by 10. In addition, we can see that adding the subsequent linear base numbers and their corresponding circular base numbers adds up to multiples of 10. For example, the first linear base number which is 3 plus the first circular base number which is 7 gives a total of 10. The second linear base number of 6 plus the 2^nd circular base number which is 14 when added together gives a total of 10. The third unit is 9 as the linear base number plus 21 as the circular base number is equal to 10. With this, we can derive the metric units from the circle as shown below.

 

LINEAR BASE NUMBER(LBN)=IMPERIAL SYSTEM	CIRCULAR BASE NUMBER-CBN	LBN+CBN=METRIC SYSTEM
3	7	10
6	14	20
9	21	30
12	28	40
15	35	50
18	42	60
21	49	70
24	56	80
27	63	90
30	70	100
33	77	110
36	84	120
39	91	130
42	98	140
45	105	150
48	112	160
51	119	170
54	126	180
57	133	190
60	140	200
63	147	210
66	154	220
69	161	230
72	168	240
75	175	250
78	182	260
81	189	270
84	196	280
87	203	290
90	210	300
93	217	310
96	224	320
99	231	330
102	238	340
105	245	350
108	252	360

 

Thus, using the circle we have managed to derive both the metric and imperial system. This shows that they also both originated from the circle and confirms the GUSUMS hypothesis.

 

CONFIRMING THE GUSUMS CONVERSION OF METRICS TO IMPERIAL & VICE VERSA

If LBN is the right value of the imperial system, then their exact equivalent and equal values should be LBN+CBN. From this, we can identify the correct way to convert the imperial system to the metric system based on the circle. The result is shown below. I have highlighted essential values from the GUSUMS conversion table to show why 1 inch can only be equal to 2.5cm and not 2.54cm. To simplify the information and to get the exact factor, I have divided 1 by each imperial unit as well as 1 by each metric unit.

LBN=IMPERIAL SYSTEM	CBN	LBN+CBN=METRIC LBN	1/IMPERIAL LBN	1/METRIC LBN
3	7	10	0.333333333	0.1
6	14	20	0.166666667	0.05
9	21	30	0.111111111	0.033333333
12	28	40	0.083333333	0.025
15	35	50	0.066666667	0.02
18	42	60	0.055555556	0.016666667
21	49	70	0.047619048	0.014285714
24	56	80	0.041666667	0.0125
27	63	90	0.037037037	0.011111111
30	70	100	0.033333333	0.01
33	77	110	0.03030303	0.009090909
36	84	120	0.027777778	0.008333333
39	91	130	0.025641026	0.007692308
42	98	140	0.023809524	0.007142857
45	105	150	0.022222222	0.006666667
48	112	160	0.020833333	0.00625
51	119	170	0.019607843	0.005882353
54	126	180	0.018518519	0.005555556
57	133	190	0.01754386	0.005263158
60	140	200	0.016666667	0.005
63	147	210	0.015873016	0.004761905
66	154	220	0.015151515	0.004545455
69	161	230	0.014492754	0.004347826
72	168	240	0.013888889	0.004166667
75	175	250	0.013333333	0.004
78	182	260	0.012820513	0.003846154
81	189	270	0.012345679	0.003703704
84	196	280	0.011904762	0.003571429
87	203	290	0.011494253	0.003448276
90	210	300	0.011111111	0.003333333
93	217	310	0.010752688	0.003225806
96	224	320	0.010416667	0.003125
99	231	330	0.01010101	0.003030303
102	238	340	0.009803922	0.002941176
105	245	350	0.00952381	0.002857143
108	252	360	0.009259259	0.002777778

 

The above table confirms that based on the circle, the following is the only possible way to align the Imperial Units and Values and that is why if we were to adhere to the original values and conversion of the metric and imperial units based on the originally intended and interpreted, an inch should be equal to 2.5cm and not 2.54cm.

Basically, converting metrics to imperial follows the following pattern for the first view of original units. Not that the mile is  derived or is defined based on km.

Column1	3	6	9	12	15	18	21	24	27	30	33	36
0.0001	3.33E-05	1.67E-05	1.11E-05	8.33E-06	6.67E-06	5.56E-06	4.76E-06	4.17E-06	3.7E-06	3.33E-06	3.03E-06	2.78E-06
0.001	0.000333	0.000167	0.000111	8.33E-05	6.67E-05	5.56E-05	4.76E-05	4.17E-05	3.7E-05	3.33E-05	3.03E-05	2.78E-05
0.01	0.003333	0.001667	0.001111	0.000833	0.000667	0.000556	0.000476	0.000417	0.00037	0.000333	0.000303	0.000278
0.1	0.033333	0.016667	0.011111	0.008333	0.006667	0.005556	0.004762	0.004167	0.003704	0.003333	0.00303	0.002778
1	0.333333	0.166667	0.111111	0.083333	0.066667	0.055556	0.047619	0.041667	0.037037	0.033333	0.030303	0.027778
10	3.333333	1.666667	1.111111	0.833333	0.666667	0.555556	0.47619	0.416667	0.37037	0.333333	0.30303	0.277778
100	33.33333	16.66667	11.11111	8.333333	6.666667	5.555556	4.761905	4.166667	3.703704	3.333333	3.030303	2.777778
1000	333.3333	166.6667	111.1111	83.33333	66.66667	55.55556	47.61905	41.66667	37.03704	33.33333	30.30303	27.77778
10000	3333.333	1666.667	1111.111	833.3333	666.6667	555.5556	476.1905	416.6667	370.3704	333.3333	303.0303	277.7778
100000	33333.33	16666.67	11111.11	8333.333	6666.667	5555.556	4761.905	4166.667	3703.704	3333.333	3030.303	2777.778

 

 

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CONCEPT

The concept is not just about converting numbers as it is of great significance to our ability to understand our world and the universe at large. With just a small change I can identify the exact values and properties of all objects in our solar system with a margin of error of zero. This means I can identify the exact diameters, rotational periods, circumferences, etc. of faraway objects such as planets, stars, moons, stars, etc., by just using our current values that are often with margins of error as much as +-3 km to get the exact value. This is because all the creation is also based on the circle. GUSUMS theorizes that the following is how we can identify the exact values of planetary objects. Please note that the first few explanations are just meant to provide a basic understanding and it is the example of Pluto that provides some evidence of this.

 

PLANETARY OBJECTS	DIVISION	DIAMETERS (D)	d/7	LINEAR C	CIRCULAR C
PLANETARY OBJECTA	START	1	0.142857143	3	3.142857143
PLANETARY OBJECTA		2	0.285714286	6	6.285714286
PLANETARY OBJECTA		3	0.428571429	9	9.428571429
PLANETARY OBJECTA	MIDPOINT	4	0.571428571	12	12.57142857
PLANETARY OBJECTA		5	0.714285714	15	15.71428571
PLANETARY OBJECTA		6	0.857142857	18	18.85714286
PLANETARY OBJECTA	END	7	1	21	22
PLANETARY OBJECTB	START	8	1.142857143	24	25.14285714
PLANETARY OBJECTB		9	1.285714286	27	28.28571429
PLANETARY OBJECTB		10	1.428571429	30	31.42857143
PLANETARY OBJECTB	END	11	1.571428571	33	34.57142857
PLANETARY OBJECTB		12	1.714285714	36	37.71428571
PLANETARY OBJECTB		13	1.857142857	39	40.85714286
PLANETARY OBJECTB	MIDPOINT	14	2	42	44
PLANETARY OBJECTC	START	15	2.142857143	45	47.14285714
PLANETARY OBJECTC		16	2.285714286	48	50.28571429
PLANETARY OBJECTC		17	2.428571429	51	53.42857143
PLANETARY OBJECTC	END	18	2.571428571	54	56.57142857
PLANETARY OBJECTC		19	2.714285714	57	59.71428571
PLANETARY OBJECTC		20	2.857142857	60	62.85714286
PLANETARY OBJECTC	MIDPOINT	21	3	63	66
PLANETARY OBJECTD	START	22	3.142857143	66	69.14285714
PLANETARY OBJECTD		23	3.285714286	69	72.28571429
PLANETARY OBJECTD		24	3.428571429	72	75.42857143
PLANETARY OBJECTD	MIDPOINT	25	3.571428571	75	78.57142857
PLANETARY OBJECTD		26	3.714285714	78	81.71428571
PLANETARY OBJECTD		27	3.857142857	81	84.85714286
PLANETARY OBJECTD	END	28	4	84	88
PLANETARY OBJECTE	START	29	4.142857143	87	91.14285714
PLANETARY OBJECTE		30	4.285714286	90	94.28571429
PLANETARY OBJECTE		31	4.428571429	93	97.42857143
PLANETARY OBJECTE	END	32	4.571428571	96	100.5714286
PLANETARY OBJECTE		33	4.714285714	99	103.7142857
PLANETARY OBJECTE		34	4.857142857	102	106.8571429
PLANETARY OBJECTF	MIDPOINT	35	5	105	110
PLANETARY OBJECTF	START	36	5.142857143	108	113.1428571
PLANETARY OBJECTF		37	5.285714286	111	116.2857143
PLANETARY OBJECTF		38	5.428571429	114	119.4285714
PLANETARY OBJECTF	END	39	5.571428571	117	122.5714286
PLANETARY OBJECTF		40	5.714285714	120	125.7142857
PLANETARY OBJECTF		41	5.857142857	123	128.8571429
PLANETARY OBJECTF	MIDPOINT	42	6	126	132
PLANETARY OBJECTG	START	43	6.142857143	129	135.1428571
PLANETARY OBJECTG		44	6.285714286	132	138.2857143
PLANETARY OBJECTG		45	6.428571429	135	141.4285714
PLANETARY OBJECTG	END	46	6.571428571	138	144.5714286
PLANETARY OBJECTG		47	6.714285714	141	147.7142857
PLANETARY OBJECTG		48	6.857142857	144	150.8571429
PLANETARY OBJECTG	MIDPOINT	49	7	147	154

 

The above table shows my working theory of identifying the planetary objects in our solar. We know that the creator was a perfectionist and based on the pi rules the circular measures of planetary objects are likely to have values ending in 0.142857142, 0.285714285, 0.428571428, 0.571428571, 0.714285714, 0.857142857, or a whole number. Theoretically speaking, since the creator was a perfectionist and planetary objects are so perfect then it means they are all designated exact values or operating areas that they can collide with each other. We also know that the circumference or the relationship between two objects orbiting or revolving around each other follows the pattern below.

Rotation and Revolution of Planetary Objects

The above image shows the only possible way in which planetary objects can rotate/revolve around one another without colliding no matter how close they get. For example, assuming the small green circle is the sun and the orange circles are how the earth rotates around the sun. The above is the same exact formula we use to calculate the orbits of all the planetary objects by adding an extra circumference. In addition, the above simple image shows exactly how we can calculate the perihelion and aphelion of the planets. Note the 7 circles that make the complete circles. If we were to combine the above image and the table prior to the image, then;

1.      Each planetary object is likely to be allocated an ‘operating area’ that is between 0.142857142, 0.285714285, 0.428571428, 0.571428571, 0.714285714, 0.857142857, or a whole number for example 1 or 7. This limits the possible exact values of planetary objects to just 7 values.

2.      I can enhance this by stating that it is highly likely that the exact value e.g., the equatorial diameter of the planetary objects is either at the start, mid-point, or end of the 7 values. Regarding the perihelion and aphelion of the planets, it is highly likely that the perihelion is just at the whole number before the start of 0.142857 or at exactly where the 0.142857 appears and the perihelion is likely to be where the next whole number appears.

3.      The values can also be used to identify the number of objects surrounding a planetary object. For example, if the earth’s ‘operating area’ is from 1-490 and there are 7 whole divisions surrounding it as in the image below then maybe that is the ‘operating area’ of its moon.

4.      My working theory so far is that the values of the planets such as their diameters and radii are actually whole numbers. This means that the exact diameters of the planets can be identified where the metric and imperial units are whole numbers. However, we have never noticed this since we are using the wrong conversion of Metric to imperial units.

 

To avoid sounding like a conspiracy theorist as this is still a work in progress. I will give the example of Pluto. The diameter of Pluto in KM is stated as 2376 metric units. I am using the metric units as the base value for the analysis as the contention is whether 1 inch is equal to 2.54 cm or 2.5cm. Remember, my working theory is that the diameter in KM when converted to miles should also be a whole number.

1 km to the current imperial mile assuming 1inch is equal to 2.54cm requires multiplying the number of KM by 0.621371192

1km based on GUSUMS where 1 inch is equal to 2.5cm requires multiplying the number of km by 0.6313131313131

The results of this is shown below

	FACTOR	D OF PLUTO	IN MILES
IMPERIAL MILE	0.621371192	2376	1476.377953
GUSUMS MILE	0.631313131	2376	1500

 

Thus, the GUSUMS hypothesis is not far-fetched area mere speculations as there is practical evidence of this. However, I think is premature to make this conclusion as we need to first address the exact value of pi to improve the current estimates and make the necessary corrections before farther investigating this concept.